A comparative study of vaginal misoprostol, dinoprostone gel, foley catheter, extra amniotic saline infusion along with vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term

Shetty, Ektha M.; Neravi, Asha

dc.contributor.author	Shetty, Ektha M.
dc.contributor.author	Neravi, Asha
dc.date.accessioned	2021-06-29T07:26:13Z
dc.date.available	2021-06-29T07:26:13Z
dc.date.issued	2020-09
dc.identifier.citation	International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020 Sep; 9(9): 3683-3687.	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	2320-1770
dc.identifier.uri	http://localhost/xmlui/handle/123456789/1727
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	Medip Academy	en_US
dc.subject	Extra amniotic saline infusion	en_US
dc.subject	Bishop score
dc.subject	Dinoprostone gel
dc.subject	Extra amniotic saline infusion
dc.subject	Foley catheter
dc.subject	Induction of labor
dc.subject	Misoprostol
dc.title	A comparative study of vaginal misoprostol, dinoprostone gel, foley catheter, extra amniotic saline infusion along with vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term	en_US
dc.type	Article	en_US